1) Document says it's 10 pages and schedules A1, A2, B, C noted. 

2) Only 9 pages were provided, no schedule Cs, and many fields were blank.  

3) Given the obvious problems, why was this accepted by 1) the Clerk of the Board or 2)  the Clerk of Monterey County?

Verification Block is properly completed.  

1) Total number of pages - BLANK

2) Page 2 / Board list had changed.  Schedule Cs included and blanks were filled in, but many were still non-responsive to questions asked. 

3) Given the obvious problems, why was this accepted by 1) the Clerk of the Board or 2)  the Clerk of Monterey County?

Verification Block is properly completed.  

1/26/2023 - Signed by Church
2/2/2023 - Filed with County
4/6/2023 - Filed with FPPC  (64 days later)  

1) Document says it's 10 pages and schedules A1, A2, B, C noted. 

2) Only 9 pages were provided, no schedule Cs, and many fields were blank.  

3) Given the obvious problems, why was this accepted by 1) the Clerk of the Board 2)  the Clerk of Monterey County 3) the Clerk for the FPPC?

 
Why is the personal information redacted?  This is a public document and it is supposed to be actionable?

Why wasn't this sent to FPPC when it was accepted by Monterey County?  This means Monterey County is the one who required the Amendment or they called the state and had the state push it without the original filing.
Was a late  filing penalty applied?
Are there  emails or dialogue that transpired between County Clerk and FPPC?