SEI 700 forms for California County Supervisors are supposed to be filed with the County and the State. The "exact same form / data" is supposed to go to two places.  

If I told you to imagine a County Supervisor who thought he could put a dramatically less informative copy on with the county than the state,  seemingly thinking  that nobody in his county would be able to get the state filing, how far might he go to mislead, misstate, confuse?   

On 1/3/2023 Church was inagurated. 
On 2/2/2023 Church filed his assuming office SEI 700 form. It was woeflly incomplete in an obvious manner that should have prvented acceptance by the Clerk.  Wrong page count, missing schedule C, etc. Church listed Three Boards/commitees he was involved with in addition to Board of Supervisors.
On 3/16/2023 Church files an ammended form with the County and it includes no boards. 

Those copies were then sent to the state and accepted there when they should not have been.   Those documents included disclosure that his wife made ore than 10,000 from the Monterey Herald. 

On 3/7/2024 Church  e-filed his SEI 700 data with the county. He listed no clients over 10k to the county. 

On 3/22/2024 Church e-filed his SEI 700 data with the state. He listed Monterey Herald and Voices of Monterey Bay to the state. 

On 3/2/2025 at 9:20 am Church  e-filed his SEI 700 data with the county.  He listed 12 Boards on his county e-filed document. 

On 3/2/2025 at 8:37 am  Church  e-filed his SEI 700 data with the state.  He listed  6 Boards on his state e-filed document with three of those being multi-county boards not listed on his county filing. 

On 2/16/2026 Church  e-filed his SEI 700 data with the county.  

On 2/17/2026  Church  e-filed his SEI 700 data with the state.